As such, the Lex Cryptographia ecosystem is not an anarchy to the extent that rules, although cryptographic in nature, apply. The second chapter discusses how, in the absence of Rule of Law enforceability, users can protect their fundamental rights through/on blockchain thanks to its cryptographic architecture. We show, however, that this partial ineffectiveness of the Rule of Law is offset by the emergence of another ecosystem-here referred to as the Lex Cryptographia ecosystem-in which it is not the State that ensures the protection of fundamental rights, but the technology. Within blockchain, the exercise of such a monopoly is made more complex. The State, as it is conceived in our Western societies, has a monopoly of force and justice on its territory to protect the rights of its citizens.
Written as part of a collective book on “General Principles and Digitalisation,” it engages with Robert Nozick’s idea (former Professor of Philosophy at Harvard University) whereby different ecosystems can coexist for the better, and applies it to the realm of fundamental rights.įirst, this article aims to explain why blockchain raises new legal challenges that have a significant impact in terms of fundamental rights. Would you enter it? Would you be willing to trade a few of your existing rights to get new ones? Would you also be ready to trade some of them in return for further services? Those are the questions I try to answer in this article. Imagine a space where fundamental rights are created and enforced by the technology, a space in which your rights are absolute, meaning that you enjoy no limits on them in exchange for not being able to do anything in case of a violation of these rights. Imagine a space in which the Rule of Law does not have the same prevalence it has in the real space.
0 kommentar(er)
